State v. Harris
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1750
Syllabus
APP.R. 12(D) — PREJUDICIAL ERROR — COURT COSTS — NUNC PRO TUNC — RES JUDICATA: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion to correct the record where the correction defendant sought affected a legal judgment and not a clerical mistake, and where defendant did not suffer any prejudice from the lower court's failure to issue a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry: any claimed errors in defendant's sentence are barred by res judicata.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. Hamilton County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 10×
- State ex rel. Harris v. Hamilton Cty. Clerk of Courts (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-22· cited 7×
- State v. SinclairOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-08· cited 3×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.