State v. Harris

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 3329

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling two motions to suppress evidence. With respect to pretrial identifications of appellant, one identification was based on a single photograph, but it was made by a person who had known appellant for years the trial court reasonably concluded that it was reliable. The second identification resulted from the presentation of a photo array to a witness by a blind administrator the trial court reasonably concluded that the identification procedure was not suggestive. The search of a backpack in appellant's possession when he was arrested was incident to his arrest, and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion to suppress the evidence found therein. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Finally, the trial court's findings in support of consecutive sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.