Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/9/2026

State v. Harrell

Citations

2026 Ohio 54

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity is supported by sufficient evidence. Appellant was not prejudiced by the State's amendment to the indictment. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
Boyle v. United States
Supreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 823×
State v. Sellards
Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-06-05· cited 417×
State v. Finnerty
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 257×
United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter Demopoulos
Seventh Circuit· 1994-02-18· cited 193×
State v. O'Brien
Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-05-20· cited 176×
United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy Sweeton
Eleventh Circuit· 1991-01-30· cited 130×
United States v. Johnson
Seventh Circuit· 2010-01-19· cited 105×
United States v. Elliott
Fifth Circuit· 1978-06-02· cited 72×
State v. Groce (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-16· cited 53×
United States v. Gallegos
Tenth Circuit· 2015-04-30· cited 32×
State v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court· 2025-08-12· cited 26×
State v. Stevens
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-13· cited 16×
State v. Madding
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 6×
State v. Harrell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-15· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.