Skip to main content

State v. Harrell

Citations

  • 248 N.E.3d 995
  • 2024 Ohio 3029

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it granted the State's motion for appellant to be held without bond pending trial. The State proved by clear and convincing evidence that appellant had committed the offenses, that he posed a substantial risk of serious physical harm to any person or to the community, and that no release condition would reasonably assure the safety of the community. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.