State v. Harr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a criminal sentence cannot be consecutive to an NGI commitment because there was no statutory authorization to do so
• applying Beets to preclude sentence credit for a period when the defendant was committed after being adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) of an unrelated crime, even though the NGI commitment was not a sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Christopher W. Yakich
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2022-02-16· cited 20×
• State v. Fugere
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-03-06· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Beets
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-24· cited 54×
• State v. Gavigan
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-12-10· cited 41×
• State v. Martin
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 39×
• State v. Demars
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-04-11· cited 22×
• State v. Szulczewski
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1997-02-13· cited 5×