Skip to main content
· 3/2/1990

State v. Harpool

Citations

  • 788 P.2d 281
  • 246 Kan. 226
  • 1990 Kan. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after determining appeal was not an interlocutory appeal as State asserted but “is clearly meant to be an appeal on a question reserved,” court reversed and remanded for imposition of a lawful, longer sentence upon defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.