Skip to main content
· 2/5/1974

State v. Hari

Citations

  • 16 Or. App. 357
  • 518 P.2d 1054
  • 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether petitioner’s constitutional rights have been violated is not an issue that is properly reviewable by courts of the rendition state
  • whether petitioner's constitutional rights have been violated is not an issue that is properly reviewable by courts of the rendition state
  • whether petitioner's constitutional rights have been violated is not an issue that is properly reviewable by courts of the rendition state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fort, Langtry, Schwab

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.