State v. Hardwick
Citations
- 63 Wash. 35
- 114 P. 873
Syllabus
<p>Gaming — Information — Sufficiency. An information charging merely the opening and conducting of a gambling game without alleging that it was done in any of the capacities prohibited by Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2469, is insufficient to sustain a conviction of a felony under that section, or of a misdemeanor under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2470, prohibiting betting or wagering on a game carried on in violation of § 2469.</p> <p>Dunbab, C. J., dissents.</p>
Judges: Dunbar, Gose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court· 1963-05-29· cited 26×
- State v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court· 1920-07-14· cited 9×
- State v. EverittWashington Supreme Court· 1923-12-06· cited 2×
- State v. ManolisWashington Supreme Court· 1923-12-21· cited 2×
- People v. BenítezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1913-03-06
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.