State v. Harding
Citations
- 108 Wash. 606
- 185 P. 579
- 1919 Wash. LEXIS 906
Syllabus
<p>Intoxicating Liquors (48)—Defenses—Excepted Class—Burden of Showing Status. Under Laws 1917, p. 60, § 17b, making it unlawful for any person, except a regularly ordained clergyman, priest or rabbi, to have possession of intoxicating liquor, the burden of showing that the accused was a clergyman or rabbi is upon the defendant as a matter of defense.</p> <p>Criminal Law (197)—Indorsement of New Witnesses—Discretion. It cannot be said to be an abuse of discretion to allow new names to be indorsed on the information seven days before the trial, where the record fails to show the grounds of the application or that any continuance was asked.</p> <p>Same (143)—Evidence — Documentary Evidence — Certified Copies. In a criminal prosecution, a certified copy from the office of the secretary of state of accused’s application for an automobile license is admissible, in view of Rem. Code, §§ 5562-5, 5562-6, requiring an application in triplicate, one to be filed with the secretary of state.</p>
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. RosenbergSecond Circuit· 1952-04-08· cited 201×
- State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court· 1971-04-15· cited 24×
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court· 1921-09-27· cited 11×
- State v. GriebelMontana Supreme Court· 1922-12-18· cited 11×
- United States v. RosenbergSecond Circuit· 1952-02-25· cited 7×
- State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court· 1923-06-12· cited 4×
- State v. CressWashington Supreme Court· 1924-04-22· cited 3×
- State v. FranichWashington Supreme Court· 1919-12-15· cited 2×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-27· cited 2×
- Willerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-01-24· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court· 1909-07-14· cited 77×
- State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court· 1896-04-13· cited 47×
- State v. HoledgerWashington Supreme Court· 1896-11-06· cited 38×
- Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court· 1897-07-29· cited 38×
- State v. Van WatersWashington Supreme Court· 1904-12-22· cited 25×
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court· 1909-12-27· cited 23×
- State v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court· 1897-03-16· cited 16×
- State v. KoernerWashington Supreme Court· 1918-09-23· cited 15×
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1903-04-06· cited 14×
- State v. SextonWashington Supreme Court· 1905-02-18· cited 14×
- Town of Kirkland v. FerryWashington Supreme Court· 1907-03-13· cited 8×
- State v. McCaskeyWashington Supreme Court· 1917-07-25· cited 7×
- State v. PolkWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-30· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.