Skip to main content
· 9/2/1982

State v. Harder

Citations

  • 650 P.2d 724
  • 8 Kan. App. 2d 98
  • 1982 Kan. App. LEXIS 231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence admissible because initial intrusion came within the plain view doctrine
  • evidence admissible because initial intrusion came within the plain view doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swinehart, Spencer, Meyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.