State v. Harden
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5255
Syllabus
POSTCONVICTION — R.C. 2953.23 — JURISDICTION: The trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain defendant's untimely petitions for postconviction relief where defendant pleaded guilty to the offense and therefore could not show that he would not have been found guilty by a reasonable fact finder without the constitutional error at trial, as required by R.C. 2953.23(A)(1)(b). [See CONCURRENCE: Defendant makes a compelling case for expanding eligibility for expungement and the legislature should consider doing so.]
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court· 2002-08-28· cited 236×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2024-01-18· cited 29×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 23×
- State v. DemyanOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-13· cited 10×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-09-20· cited 6×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-11· cited 6×
- State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-04· cited 6×
- State v. J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-17· cited 6×
- State v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-28· cited 5×
- State v. ChamblinOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.