State v. Harbaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the use of the word “may” in I.C.R. 33 indicates a court’s discretion in applying the rule and thus alleged errors are reviewed for an abuse of discretion on appeal
• use of “may” in Idaho Criminal Rule 33 denotes court’s discretion in applying rule
• use of “may dismiss” rather than “shall dismiss” in Idaho Criminal Rule 48(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Preston Adam Joy
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2013-06-25· cited 53×
• State v. Maxey
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-21· cited 20×
• State v. Mathews
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 14×
• State v. Hanson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-02-25· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hedger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-02-10· cited 676×
• Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-02· cited 492×
• State v. Freeman
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-01-30· cited 94×
• State v. Currington
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 38×
• State v. Flora
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-12-30· cited 2×