Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/28/1966
State v. Hanusiak
Citations
- 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 34
- 225 A.2d 208
- 1966 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suspension mandatory under 14-277b, even though license holder found not guilty of charge under 14-227a , because he refused to take one of the blood alcohol tests
- § 14-227b contemplates that the trier of facts shall make the finding of operation
- § 14-227b contemplates that the trier of facts shall make the finding of operation
- § 14-227b contemplates that trier of facts shall make finding of operation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Kosicki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 92×
- O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-02-01· cited 36×
- In Re McCainNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-02-23· cited 19×
- Redden v. KozlowskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-20· cited 8×
- Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-22· cited 3×
- Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. McCainNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-02-23· cited 2×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1937-04-12· cited 2,059×
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 760×
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1942-04-06· cited 494×
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1939-05-15· cited 348×
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-02-13· cited 151×
- State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court· 1958-07-30· cited 88×
- Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court· 1961-06-23· cited 76×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-08-07· cited 64×
- State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-10-15· cited 56×
- Finocchairo v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals· 1962-03-01· cited 52×
- Wilson v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-07-29· cited 49×
- Schwartz v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-07-21· cited 49×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-10-26· cited 48×
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1961-01-21· cited 48×
- Dempsey v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-02-10· cited 44×
- State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-10-27· cited 44×
- Butler v. SteckSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-01-20· cited 39×
- State v. SeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1956-02-17· cited 37×
- Young v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-06-13· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.