Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/16/2005
State v. Hanson
Citations
- 280 Kan. 709
- 124 P.3d 486
- 2005 Kan. LEXIS 875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding jeopardy did not attach to de 10 novo appeal to district court from magistrate court conviction, so State could refile same charges after district court dismissed appeal without prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci, Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 588×
- State v. LegeroSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-25· cited 37×
- State v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 29×
- State v. BurkettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-07-16· cited 12×
- State v. BeerbowerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-04-18· cited 10×
- State v. HeigeleCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-03-30· cited 10×
- State v. RemlingerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-10-30· cited 10×
- City of Salina v. AmadorSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-03-04· cited 9×
- City of Wichita v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-06-01· cited 5×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-07-20· cited 5×
- State v. DerusseauCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-10-09· cited 5×
- City of Halstead v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-12-30· cited 4×
- City of Bonner Springs v. BeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-01-26· cited 4×
- City of Liberal v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-02-23· cited 4×
- City of Salina v. AmadorCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-03-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.