Skip to main content

State v. Hanson

Citations

  • 793 S.W.2d 270
  • 1990 WL 12222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding this statutory language was unconstitutionally vague as applied to threats of lawful action
  • holding this statutory language was unconstitutionally vague as applied to threats of lawful action
  • “A vague statute that potentially could punish protected political debate violates due process because of its chilling effect on the exercise of that essential right.”
  • “A vague statute that potentially could punish protected political debate violates due process because of its chilling effect on the exercise of that essential right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Means, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.