State v. Hanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The determination that an accused is competent to stand trial is within the trial court's discretion, and will not be reversed on appeal absent manifest abuse of discretion.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Crenshaw
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-09-29· cited 35×
• Parrish v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-05-14· cited 32×
• State v. Hicks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-05· cited 17×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-06-28· cited 14×
• State v. Ermert
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-03-31· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kroll
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 152×
• State v. Dana
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-04-04· cited 120×
• State v. Myers
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-02-05· cited 77×
• Troy Cooper v. C. J. Fitzharris
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-04-11· cited 44×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-01-14· cited 34×
• State v. Murphy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1960-09-22· cited 33×
• State v. Eldridge
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-04· cited 29×
• State v. Johnston
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-11-14· cited 24×
• State v. Floyd
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-04-17· cited 20×