State v. Hanlon
Citations
- 77 Ohio St. (N.S.) 19
Syllabus
<p>Pishing in Lake Erie — Section 6968-2, Revised Statutes — (93 O. L,, 303)- — Requirement of license and payment of fee therefor — Not in violation of 14th amendment of U. S. Constitution — Nor Section 26, Article 2, Ohio Constitution — Constitutional law.</p> <p>Section 6968-2, Revised Statutes, as amended April 26, 1898 (93 O. L., 303), in -so far as it enacts that every person, firm or corporation desiring to engage in fishing in the waters of Lake Erie and the estuaries and bays thereof within this state shall make application to the commissioners of fish and game and obtain a license or authority so tó do, and for such license or authority shall pay the fee therein specified, is a valid enactment, and is neither in violation of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, nor repugnant to Section 26, Article 2, Constitution of the State of Ohio.</p>
Judges: Crew, Davis, Price, Sitauck, Summers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1887-01-17· cited 460×
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 399×
- Osborn v. Charlevoix Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court· 1897-11-12· cited 43×
- Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court· 1905-04-15· cited 25×
- State v. MrozinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1894-12-21· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.