State v. Hanlon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \motion to continue must be decided on the particular facts and circumstances of each individual case\
• Supreme Court will not interfere with trial court's ruling on motion to continue if there is any reasonable basis to support it
• Supreme Court will not interfere with trial court’s ruling on motion to continue if there is any reasonable basis to support it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schreiner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-12-14· cited 17×
• State v. Lund
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-16· cited 17×
• Snyder Group, Inc. Act 250 - Decision on Motion
  Vermont Superior Court· 2019-08-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ahearn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-05-22· cited 52×
• State v. Sauve
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-08-11· cited 28×
• Casey v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-01-31· cited 10×
• State v. Echols
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-06-01· cited 9×
• People v. Doe
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1993-09-02· cited 4×