State v. Haney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that two assaults were not a single continuous offense, as one had “long since been completed before the second assault occurred”
• “The fact that the parties may have continued to argue with each other during the interim does not mean that the assaults were one continuing offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Grayhurst
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2004-06-23· cited 83×
• State of Iowa v. Valentin Velez
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2013-04-12· cited 77×
• State v. Day
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-07-02· cited 57×
• State v. Feliciano
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2006-07-14· cited 30×
• State v. Scanlon
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2009-11-17· cited 18×
• State v. Ruiz-Pacheco
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-07-09· cited 18×
• State v. Shelton
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2010-03-23· cited 16×
• Curtis Leslie v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-03-10· cited 7×
• State v. Michael Narcovich
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2021-02-12
• State v. Dari Garcia
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2024-07-02

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• State v. Oliveira
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-07-06· cited 54×
• State v. Sharbuno
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1978-08-16· cited 35×
• State v. Grullon
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1977-03-17· cited 34×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1978-04-20· cited 26×
• State v. McGuy
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2003-11-25· cited 24×
• Thornley v. Mullen
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1975-12-16· cited 16×