State v. Handa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he constitution as the highest . . . expression of the law-making power, operates to repeal or supersede . . . all statutes that are . . . inconsistent with the full operation of its provisions.” (first alteration in original
• “[T]he constitution as the highest . . . expression of the law-making power, operates to repeal or supersede . . . all statutes that are . . . inconsistent with the full operation of its provisions.” (first alteration in original) (quoting 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law § 43, at 135)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garcia
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-04-03· cited 8×
• Pisano v. Shillinger
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1991-07-26· cited 7×
• Morita v. Gorak.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2019-11-18· cited 2×
• People ex rel. Hinspeter v. Senkowski
  New York Supreme Court· 2002-12-11· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 575×
• Rusk v. Cort
  Supreme Court· 1962-04-02· cited 252×
• Norman J. Mastrian v. Kermit Hedman, Ramsey County Sheriff, and the State of Minnesota
  Eighth Circuit· 1964-03-30· cited 92×
• Huihui v. Shimoda
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 25×
• Parker v. Roth
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 20×
• Gold v. Shapiro
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-04-07· cited 12×