Skip to main content

State v. Hand

Citations

  • 297 Kan. 734
  • 304 P.3d 1234
  • 2013 WL 3242296
  • 2013 Kan. LEXIS 581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district judge has discretion to base restitution award on increased insurance premium rather than fair-market value of stolen property
  • finding no error by including the amount of the victim's increased insurance cost in the restitution amount
  • \[T]he statute's reference to damage or loss 'caused by' a defendant's crime is not modified by the adverb 'directly.'\
  • “[T]he statute’s reference to damage or loss ‘caused by a defendants crime is not modified by the adverb ‘directly.’”
  • \[T]he statute's reference to damage or loss 'caused by' a defendant's crime is not modified by the adverb 'directly.'\
  • despite defendant's death, court considered merits of petition for review concerning the sentencing judge's reliance on fair market value of property stolen because it was in public interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.