State v. Hampton
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7067
Syllabus
Maximum sentence R.C. 2953.08 R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 contrary to law clear and convincing. The record clearly supported the trial court's decision to impose the maximum prison sentence upon the defendant. The defendant's criminal history, including two prior bank robberies, and his pattern of alcohol abuse when committing his crimes, supported the imposition of the maximum sentence. We cannot say that the trial court failed to consider R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 and the maximum sentence was not contrary to law.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-31· cited 10×
- State v. BoczekOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-08· cited 9×
- State v. TownsendOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-13· cited 7×
- State v. WhittingtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.