State v. Hammock
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2149
Syllabus
EVIDENCE — R.C. 2921.31 — CRIMINAL TRESPASS — R.C. 2911.21 — OBSTRUCTING OFFICIAL BUSINESS — SUFFICIENCY — MANIFEST WEIGHT: Defendant's conviction for criminal trespass in violation of R.C. 2911.21(A)(3) was not supported by sufficient evidence where the evidence showed that she was the owner of the premises where she allegedly trespassed. Defendant's conviction for obstructing official business in violation of R.C. 2921.31(A) was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the evidence showed that, when a police officer attempted to enter her home to execute a search warrant, she pushed the door closed the first time the officer pried the door open and then, while swatting her arm at the officer, attempted to push the door closed the second time the officer pried the door open, to the point that the officer requested assistance from others on the scene with pushing the door open.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 21×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-04· cited 18×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-30· cited 17×
- State v. BodyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-24· cited 16×
- State v. ButtramOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-29· cited 15×
- State v. BrantleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-02· cited 12×
- In re R.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-22· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.