State v. Hammer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where a defendant was charged with burglary with intent to commit “a felony,” the jury had to agree that the defendant intended to commit a felony, but did not have to agree on what particular felony the defendant intended to commit
• defendant not entitled to jury unanimity as to intended underlying felony in a burglary charge because burglary——entering a building with intent to commit a felony——is a single offense with multiple modes of commission based upon the intended underlying felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fry
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 275×
• State v. Gardner
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-06-18· cited 220×
• United States v. Franklin
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-07-17· cited 26×
• United States v. Dennis Franklin
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2019-06-06· cited 19×
• State v. Coclough
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-05-02· cited 14×
• State v. Marriott
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-07-02· cited 14×
• State v. Adkins
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-06· cited 6×
• State v. Shannon Olance Hendricks
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-02-20
• United States v. Shane Sahm
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-07-17
• United States v. Dennis Franklin
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-07-17
• STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANDRE COCLOUGH (17-02-0070, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-05-02