Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/25/1986
State v. Hamm
Citations
- 710 S.W.2d 335
- 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “conflicting testimony ... concerning defendant’s clothing and travel time for a certain distance [were] not of grave importance when balanced against” eye witness testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd, Grist, Reinhard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JohnsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-10-09· cited 121×
- State v. HurttSupreme Court of Missouri· 1974-04-08· cited 52×
- State v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-10-11· cited 47×
- State v. HarveyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-09-21· cited 32×
- State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-06-01· cited 19×
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-02-28· cited 17×
- State v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1980-02-19· cited 10×
- State v. NewtonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-08-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.