State v. Hamm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding it was “entirely reasonable to make” sentences for “separate sexual assault counts involving different persons at different times and locations consecutive to each other”
• it is reasonable to make sentences consecutive if counts involved different victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Engberg v. Meyer
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 84×
• Farrell v. John Deere Co.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1989-05-24· cited 30×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-04-23· cited 24×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2006-01-24· cited 6×
• State v. Mulroy
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-05-11
• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-02-17
• State v. Max E. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2025-11-13