State v. Hamlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e do not interpret the indictment to impose an elevated burden of proof with respect to an element as to which such a burden is not unambiguously pleaded.”
• legislative purpose of statute used to determine mental state required for the crime
• “Irrespective of whether the state was required under ORS 161.115(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26· cited 13×
• City of Beaverton v. Pack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-16· cited 1×
• State v. McMillin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wimber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-24· cited 78×
• State v. Rutley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-11-08· cited 34×
• State v. Hval
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 32×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 29×
• State v. Van Walchren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-04-01· cited 6×
• State v. Burns
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-23· cited 6×
• State v. Monroe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-04-25· cited 5×