Skip to main content

State v. Hamilton

Citations

  • 233 P.3d 432
  • 348 Or. 371
  • 2010 Ore. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “another person” who the defendant threatened with physical force was a victim for purposes of the robbery statute
  • holding that a robbery “victim” is one “against whom a defendant uses or threatens violence in the course of committing or attempting to commit theft” (emphasis added)
  • \The robbery statutes are a product of the comprehensive revision of the state criminal code in 1971.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, and Walters, Justices

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.