New Mexico Court of Appeals· 8/12/1986
State v. Hamilton
Citations
- 725 P.2d 590
- 104 N.M. 614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that an indigent defendant’s waiver of 8 counsel must be clear and unequivocal
- relying on Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution as precluding presumption of waiver of counsel from a silent record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bivins, Donnelly, Fruman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-01-12· cited 234×
- Davila v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 45×
- State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-11-21· cited 37×
- State v. YoungNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-04-20· cited 26×
- Teske v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-04-14· cited 25×
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-03-15· cited 25×
- State v. HamiltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-03-17· cited 17×
- State v. WatchmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-22· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.