State v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court should have denied the state’s motion for continuance, and if the state failed to prove its ease because of the unavailability of a witness, a directed verdict should have been entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Evans
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-25· cited 22×
• State v. Ottrock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-16· cited 10×
• State v. Lundy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-30· cited 7×
• State v. Fortesa-Ruiz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-27· cited 4×
• State v. Kalfani
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-26· cited 2×
• State v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-11· cited 2×
• State v. Haynes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-21· cited 2×
• State v. Laroche
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1986-12-10
• State v. Berman
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1990-07-10
• State v. Perala
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1990-12-27
• State v. Joyner
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1991-03-22
• State v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-21
• State v. Soles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-07

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-04· cited 18×