Nebraska Supreme Court· 7/18/1986
State v. Hamblin
Citations
- 390 N.W.2d 533
- 223 Neb. 469
- 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state need only show for enhancement purposes that defendant was represented at previous conviction; other objections present impermissible collateral attacks
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LouthanNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-06-25· cited 206×
- State v. WiltshireNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-10-30· cited 79×
- State v. OliverNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-01-13· cited 45×
- State v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 38×
- Morse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-06-21· cited 21×
- State v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-01-16· cited 16×
- State v. JamesonNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-10-31· cited 12×
- State v. SlezakNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-09-04· cited 10×
- LeGrand v. StateNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-01-10· cited 9×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.