Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/28/1977
State v. Ham
Citations
- 233 S.E.2d 698
- 268 S.C. 340
- 1977 S.C. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the determination of guilt is dependent upon the credibility of the witnesses, a motion for a directed verdict is properly refused.”
- Where the determination of guilt is dependent upon the credibility of the witnesses, a motion for a directed verdict is properly refused.
- Where the determination of guilt is dependent upon the credibility of the witnesses, a motion for a directed verdict is properly refused.
- Where the determination of guilt is dependant upon the credibility of the witnesses, a motion for a directed verdict is properly refused.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Rhodes, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-09-29· cited 27×
- State v. DasherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-04· cited 21×
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-04-06· cited 12×
- Hayden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-26· cited 9×
- Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-07· cited 2×
- City of Pickens v. SchmitzSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-01-23· cited 1×
- State v. RowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-16· cited 1×
- Ham v. LeekeD. South Carolina· 1978-04-19· cited 1×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-07
- Ham v. LeekeD. South Carolina· 1978-03-30
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.