State v. Halverson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[t]he determination of the sufficiency of the evidence ... `may depend upon the difference between pure speculation and legitimate inference from proven facts.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ashker
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-08-19· cited 69×
• State v. Holzer
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-07· cited 31×
• State v. LaCroix
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-05-18· cited 24×
• State v. Schnaidt
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-07-22· cited 19×
• State v. Ashley
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-08-01· cited 18×
• State v. Handy
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 17×
• State v. Boutchee
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-05-27· cited 11×
• State v. Sitting Crow
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-17· cited 9×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Curley v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1947-01-13· cited 568×
• United States v. James Felix Knife, United States of America v. Leroy Lavern Iyotte
  Eighth Circuit· 1979-02-15· cited 110×
• State v. Blakey
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-27· cited 45×
• State v. Hoenscheid
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-09-06· cited 44×
• State v. Gallegos
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 43×
• State v. Myott
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-11-12· cited 31×
• State v. Miller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-12-16· cited 30×
• State v. Vogel
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-01-20· cited 29×
• State v. Dirk
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-02-27· cited 22×
• State v. Robb
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-03-18· cited 19×
• United States v. Cascade Linen Supply Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1958-03-17· cited 6×