State v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because it is seldom subject to direct proof, intent must be inferred from the acts of the accused and the facts and circumstances of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gittens
  Montana Supreme Court· 2008-02-15· cited 31×
• State v. Boston
  Montana Supreme Court· 1994-11-21· cited 18×
• State v. Arthun
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-11-12· cited 16×
• Alexander v. Bozeman Motors, Inc.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2010-06-09· cited 15×
• State v. Hulbert
  Montana Supreme Court· 1994-06-21· cited 10×
• State v. Rathbun
  Montana Supreme Court· 2003-08-12· cited 4×
• State v. B. Mefford
  Montana Supreme Court· 2022-09-27· cited 3×
• State v. Boston
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-03-02· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. Wisconsin
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
• State v. Miller
  Montana Supreme Court· 1988-05-04· cited 54×
• State v. Burke
  Montana Supreme Court· 1988-12-15· cited 52×
• State v. Krum
  Montana Supreme Court· 1989-08-10· cited 22×
• State v. Garberding
  Montana Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 10×
• State v. Smith
  Montana Supreme Court· 1983-04-07· cited 10×
• State v. Scheffelman
  Montana Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 9×
• State v. Crumley
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-09-16· cited 5×