State v. Hall
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3455
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in accepting appellant's no-contest pleas while motions to dismiss and to suppress were pending. The no-contest pleas simply rendered those motions moot. Appellant's alleged lack of notice of a civil-protection-order hearing does not invalidate his criminal conviction for violating the order. Appellant could not collaterally attack the order's validity in his criminal cases. In addition, appellant presented no affidavit or other evidence below to support his claimed lack of notice, and the trial court made no ruling on the issue. Therefore, there is nothing to review on appeal even if appellant could raise the lack-of-notice issue. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-18· cited 12×
- State v. FletcherOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-30· cited 6×
- State v. GardOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-14· cited 4×
- State v. YBarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-01· cited 3×
- State v. LefflerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-24· cited 3×
- Conneaut v. BabcockOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.