State v. Hall
Citations
- 54 Wash. 142
- 102 P. 888
- 1909 Wash. LEXIS 959
Syllabus
<p>Indictment and Information — Statutory Language — Robbery. An information in the language of the statute is not sufficient in charging the crime of robbery or larceny from the person.</p> <p>Robbery — Information—Alleging Right to Property — Sufficiency. An information for robbery charging the forcibly taking of the property of A from the immediate presence of B, without showing any connection between A and B or the right of B to control and dominion over the property, is insufficient to sustain a conviction.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Aider by Verdict. The doctrine of aider by verdict does not apply in a criminal case where the information was insufficient to sustain a conviction.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Decision—Effect. Upon reversal of a conviction for robbery because the information failed to allege the right of the person robbed to control and dominion over the property taken, the accused is not entitled to a discharge, but the case will be remanded for further proceedings.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- information charging the defendant with robbery held defective for failing to state court-implied requirement that the victim had control and dominion over the property taken
- information charging the defendant with robbery held defective for failing to state court-implied requirement that the victim had control and dominion over the property taken
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chadwick, Fullerton, Gose, Morris, Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 539×
- State v. TvedtWashington Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 108×
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 2005-12-01· cited 82×
- Putnam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-05-05· cited 50×
- State v. EatonWashington Supreme Court· 2010-03-25· cited 40×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-20· cited 26×
- State Of Washington v. Michael William RichieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-22· cited 23×
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1917-01-18· cited 22×
- State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-24· cited 19×
- State v. Gonzalez-LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-05-01· cited 15×
- State v. BlewittCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-23· cited 10×
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-18· cited 9×
- State v. HoyleWashington Supreme Court· 1921-01-24· cited 9×
- State v. TvedtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-01· cited 4×
- State v. SchnachtelSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-12-07· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DengelWashington Supreme Court· 1901-02-15· cited 21×
- State v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court· 1909-07-10· cited 21×
- State v. MorganWashington Supreme Court· 1903-03-07· cited 18×
- State v. LawlerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1895-11-19· cited 15×
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court· 1904-12-30· cited 14×
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-11-07· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Klein v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1904-10-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.