Skip to main content

State v. Hall

Citations

  • 100 S.E. 143
  • 112 S.C. 421
  • 1919 S.C. LEXIS 149

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Reservation op Grounds op Review — Inconsistency op Verdict With Evidence. — Where defendant did not raise in the Circuit Court the question of error in sentencing on a verdict-inconsistent with the evidence, in that defendant had been found guilty on a count charging him with procuring a name to be forged on a note, and on a count charging him with himself writing the name, such question is not properly before the Supreme Court for consideration on defendant’s appeal.</p>

Judges: Gary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.