Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/16/1986
State v. Hale
Citations
- 721 P.2d 887
- 80 Or. App. 279
- 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 3059
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here is no doubt that unresolved criminal charges are disrupting to the life of a defendant. Further, the extent of the disruption is usually worsened by the length of the delay.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Hoomissen Young, Young, Van Hoomissen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court· 1980-11-04· cited 78×
- State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 78×
- State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court· 1963-11-27· cited 54×
- State v. DykastOregon Supreme Court· 1985-12-17· cited 46×
- State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court· 1975-01-30· cited 34×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-11-04· cited 23×
- State v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-08-27· cited 13×
- State v. MeikleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-21· cited 12×
- State v. HackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-27· cited 8×
- State v. LangloisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-11-02· cited 7×
- State v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-07-27· cited 4×
- State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-07-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.