Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/15/2019

State v. Hake

Citations

2019 Ohio 1402

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by denying appellant's petition for postconviction relief because his petition was untimely, and he was not unavoidably prevented from discovering facts necessary for relief. The decision not to keep a separate copy of his own evidence was petitioner's decision and did not constitute \missing evidence.\

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Kaufhold
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-27· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Vore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-15· cited 40×
State v. Worthington
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-10· cited 17×
State v. Nelson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-07· cited 16×
State v. Berrien
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-26· cited 8×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.