Skip to main content
· 9/18/1996

State v. Haisch

Citations

  • 679 So. 2d 392
  • 1996 La. LEXIS 2387
  • 1996 WL 538682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming an order that disapproved the Department’s prospective adoptive placement; holding that “the trial court did not exceed its jurisdiction [under section 39.812(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.