State v. Hagen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the officer complied with the statute by offering Hagen the choice of taking either a blood or urine test
• commenting, in a case where the officer initially gave the driver a choice of “blood or urine,” that officer was not required to offer a choice of alternatives until the officer had offered a blood test and the driver had refused that test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ferrier
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-12-21· cited 21×
• State of Minnesota v. Isabella Anne Gendron
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-17

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dehn v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-10-14· cited 22×
• Gabrick v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-09-09· cited 8×
• Lynch v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-03-23· cited 7×
• Workman v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-11-19· cited 5×
• Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-06· cited 3×
• Mahanke v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-11-04· cited 2×
• Lindemann v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-05· cited 1×