Skip to main content
· 2/21/2019

State v. H. H. J. (In re H. H. J.)

Citations

  • 436 P.3d 75
  • 296 Or. App. 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the agency erred in determining that it could not consider the protestor’s proposal under the original solicitation and therefore initiated the FSS solicitation
  • finding a “de facto cancellation” where the procuring agency did not formally cancel the solicitation after the contract award was overturned as a result of a protest and the contracting officer “could have revived it by asking [the offeror] to renew its proposal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, James, Lagesen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.