· 2/21/2019
State v. H. H. J. (In re H. H. J.)
Citations
- 436 P.3d 75
- 296 Or. App. 199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the agency erred in determining that it could not consider the protestor’s proposal under the original solicitation and therefore initiated the FSS solicitation
- finding a “de facto cancellation” where the procuring agency did not formally cancel the solicitation after the contract award was overturned as a result of a protest and the contracting officer “could have revived it by asking [the offeror] to renew its proposal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devore, James, Lagesen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.