Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/17/2024
State v. Guy
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1902
Syllabus
The trial court did not completely fail to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a), and appellant has not established that he suffered prejudice from the trial court's failure to fully cover nonconstitutional aspects of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) during the plea colloquy. Thus, appellant is not entitled to have his pleas vacated. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-17· cited 45×
- State v. FabianOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 29×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-23· cited 23×
- State v. PerdueOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-11· cited 17×
- State v. TerrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.