State v. Guy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the jury, within their discretion, was entitled to completely discount appellant’s explanation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-11-13· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Daniels
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 119×
• State v. Oevering
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 85×
• State v. Berndt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-08-29· cited 31×
• State v. Jacobson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-03· cited 27×
• State v. Hamilton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-23· cited 25×
• State Ex Rel. Dugal v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-09-29· cited 25×
• Minnesota v. Berndt
  Supreme Court· 1987-01-12· cited 12×
• United States v. Larry Gene Higginbotham
  Eighth Circuit· 1971-12-13· cited 10×
• State v. Bergland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-05-21· cited 10×
• State v. Beeks
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-30· cited 3×
• State v. Randle
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-08-18· cited 1×