State v. Gutierrez-Reynoso
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3122
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - jury trial kidnapping felonious assault petty theft domestic violence sufficiency of the evidence restraint of liberty intent to permanently deprive of property manifest weight self-defense witness credibility constitutionality of Reagan Tokes Law indefinite prison terms.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ordinance making it unlawful to interrupt a policeman in the execution of his duty was overbroad
- holding that ordinance making it unlawful to interrupt a policeman in the execution of his duty was overbroad
- holding that \the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge\ in speech aimed at physically present public officials about to engage in challenged behavior
- holding that “[o]nly a statute that is substantially overbroad may be invalidated on its face”
- holding that \[o]nly a statute that is substantially overbroad may be invalidated on its face\
- holding that the First Amendment “protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trapp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.