State v. Gustafson
Citations
- 87 Wash. 613
- 152 P. 335
- 1915 Wash. LEXIS 955
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Habitual Criminals—Time foe Trial—Statutes —Construction—Repeal. The habitual criminal act of 1909 (Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2286), covering the whole subject-matter of the act of 1903, Id., §§ 2177 and 2178, and embracing new provisions, without fixing any time for the trial, was intended not only as a substitute, but to cover the whole subject-matter; and hence repeals the provision of the earlier act that the accused must be brought to trial within five days after serving the information.</p> <p>Criminal Law—Trial—Instructions—Failure to Testify. Under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2148, providing that it shall be the. duty of the court to instruct that no inference of guilt should arise against the accused on account of his failure to testify, it is reversible error not to do so, whether the instruction was requested or not.</p> <p>Statutes—Judicial Construction—Adoption. The amendment of an act retaining language that had received judicial interpretation will be assumed to sanction the court’s construction.</p>
Judges: Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
- Windust v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1958-03-20· cited 85×
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court· 1957-02-13· cited 47×
- Roth v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-04· cited 40×
- Harold v. ToomeyWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-28· cited 16×
- Raney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1917-07-19· cited 13×
- State v. KelchWashington Supreme Court· 1921-02-23· cited 11×
- State v. CotzWashington Supreme Court· 1916-12-29· cited 10×
- State v. SpencerWashington Supreme Court· 1924-09-20· cited 7×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court· 1915-04-20· cited 21×
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1914-02-21· cited 17×
- State v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1892-06-22· cited 11×
- State v. HanesWashington Supreme Court· 1915-03-31· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Rose v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court· 1912-02-16· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.