State v. Gusman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that decision at alcohol concentration test refusal hearing that defendant was not driving did not have estoppel effect in subsequent DUI case
• refusing to give collateral estoppel effect to license suspension hearings because they lack a full and fair opportunity to litigate
• refusing to give collateral estoppel effect to license suspension hearings because they lack a full and fair opportunity to litigate
• “[C]ollateral estoppel applies only to ultimate facts, not to evidentiary facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).