State v. Guinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• program consisted of “airplane” scheme that had the following features: (1) the positions in the program, were, from top down, “pilot,” “co-pilots,” “crew,” and “passengers;” (2) each new passenger paid $1,500 to the pilot; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Systems Corp.)
  S.D. Ohio· 2006-03-31· cited 55×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
• Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 2,355×
• Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
• Brandenburg v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,379×
• State v. Bridgeman
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-09-27· cited 1,353×
• Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 976×
• Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 941×
• Bigelow v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 767×
• Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1961-04-24· cited 535×
• Valentine v. Chrestensen
  Supreme Court· 1942-04-13· cited 445×
• Friedman v. Rogers
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-16· cited 415×
• State v. Beckley
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 19×