State v. Guerra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he jury was obviously confused by the change” because the jury asked the district court to clarify with which crimes the appellant had been charged
• determining a defendant was prejudiced when his defense was keyed to the charged offense and the constructive amendment required a substantially different offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bakdash
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-05-20· cited 8×
• State v. Bertsch
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-11-30· cited 5×
• State v. Michael Rondeau
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-11-18· cited 3×
• State v. Weltzin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-10-31· cited 2×
• State v. Barthman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-09-10· cited 1×
• State of Iowa v. James Paul Vandermark
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-10-22

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gerdes v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-05-28· cited 30×
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-01-11· cited 26×
• State v. Bluhm
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-31· cited 18×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 14×
• State v. Manley
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-21· cited 9×
• State v. Caswell
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-09· cited 8×