Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/15/2022

State v. Gubanich

Citations

194 N.E.3d 850
2022 Ohio 2815

Syllabus

motion to suppress – blood test results – R.C. 2317.02(B)(2) – physician-patient privilege – warrantless seizure – reasonable expectation of privacy – facially unconstitutional – good-faith exception

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing because Eads was an as-applied challenge, the defendant failed to demonstrate that the statute was facially unconstitutional, and the exclusionary rule was inapplicable because the officer relied in good faith on the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.